variable experimental and control groups

Control Group vs. Experimental Group

What's the difference.

Control group and experimental group are two essential components of a scientific experiment. The control group serves as a baseline for comparison, as it does not receive any treatment or intervention. It helps researchers determine the natural or expected outcome of the experiment. On the other hand, the experimental group is exposed to the independent variable or the treatment being tested. By comparing the results of the control group with the experimental group, researchers can assess the effectiveness or impact of the treatment. The control group provides a reference point, while the experimental group allows for the evaluation of the specific variable being studied.

Further Detail

Introduction.

In scientific research, control groups and experimental groups play crucial roles in understanding the effects of variables and determining causality. These groups are essential in conducting experiments and studies to gather reliable data and draw meaningful conclusions. While both groups serve distinct purposes, they possess different attributes that set them apart. In this article, we will explore and compare the attributes of control groups and experimental groups, shedding light on their significance in research.

Control Group

A control group is a group of individuals or subjects in an experiment that does not receive the experimental treatment or intervention. It serves as a baseline against which the experimental group is compared. The primary purpose of a control group is to provide a reference point to measure the effects of the independent variable in the experimental group. By keeping all other variables constant, except for the one being tested, researchers can determine whether the observed changes are due to the intervention or other factors.

One attribute of a control group is that it is randomly selected or assigned. Randomization helps ensure that the control group represents the larger population accurately, reducing the potential for bias. Additionally, the control group should be similar to the experimental group in terms of relevant characteristics such as age, gender, and health status. This similarity allows for a more accurate comparison between the two groups.

Another attribute of a control group is that it receives a placebo or a standard treatment. Placebos are inert substances or procedures that mimic the experimental treatment but have no therapeutic effect. By providing a placebo to the control group, researchers can account for the placebo effect, where individuals may experience improvements simply due to their belief in receiving treatment. Alternatively, the control group may receive a standard treatment that is already established as effective, allowing researchers to compare the experimental treatment against an existing standard.

Control groups are also characterized by their size. The larger the control group, the more reliable the results are likely to be. A larger sample size helps reduce the impact of individual variations and increases the statistical power of the study. It allows for more accurate generalizations and strengthens the validity of the findings.

Lastly, control groups are typically subjected to the same conditions as the experimental group, except for the intervention being tested. This ensures that any observed differences between the two groups can be attributed to the independent variable and not external factors. By controlling the environment and other variables, researchers can isolate the effects of the intervention and draw more accurate conclusions.

Experimental Group

The experimental group, also known as the treatment group, is the group of individuals or subjects in an experiment that receives the experimental treatment or intervention being tested. Unlike the control group, the experimental group is exposed to the independent variable, allowing researchers to assess the effects of the intervention.

One attribute of the experimental group is that it is carefully selected or assigned. Researchers must ensure that the individuals in the experimental group meet specific criteria and are representative of the population being studied. This selection process helps increase the internal validity of the study and enhances the generalizability of the findings.

Another attribute of the experimental group is that it undergoes the experimental treatment or intervention. This treatment can be a new drug, therapy, educational program, or any other intervention being tested. By administering the intervention to the experimental group, researchers can observe and measure its effects, comparing them to the control group's outcomes.

The size of the experimental group is also an important attribute. Similar to the control group, a larger sample size in the experimental group increases the reliability and statistical power of the study. It allows for more accurate assessments of the intervention's effectiveness and helps identify any potential side effects or adverse reactions.

Experimental groups are often subjected to pre and post-tests to measure the changes resulting from the intervention. These tests can include surveys, physical examinations, cognitive assessments, or any other relevant measurements. By comparing the pre and post-intervention results, researchers can determine the impact of the intervention on the dependent variable.

Lastly, experimental groups may be divided into subgroups to explore different variables or conditions. This approach allows researchers to assess the effects of the intervention across various demographics, such as age groups or different levels of severity. By analyzing subgroups within the experimental group, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of how the intervention affects different populations.

Control groups and experimental groups are fundamental components of scientific research. While control groups provide a reference point and help establish causality, experimental groups allow researchers to assess the effects of interventions. Both groups possess distinct attributes that contribute to the validity and reliability of the study. By understanding and comparing the attributes of control groups and experimental groups, researchers can conduct rigorous experiments and generate meaningful insights that advance scientific knowledge.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.

Extract Insights from Qualitative Data. In minutes.

Experimental vs control group: differences explained.

Home » Experimental vs control group: differences explained

Group Comparison Analysis is essential for understanding the differences between experimental and control groups in research. To illustrate, imagine a new medication tested against a placebo. The experimental group receives the medication, while the control group receives no treatment. This setup allows researchers to determine the medication's effectiveness based on the observed outcomes across both groups.

In essence, the experimental group experiences the intervention directly, enabling examination of its impacts. Conversely, the control group serves as a baseline, helping to identify any changes unrelated to the intervention. By analyzing these group differences, researchers gain valuable insights, enhancing the validity and reliability of their conclusions.

Understanding the Basics of Experimental Group Comparison Analysis

Understanding Group Comparison Analysis is essential for anyone interested in experimental research. This analytical approach allows researchers to determine the effects of different conditions on a specific outcome. Typically, this involves dividing participants into an experimental group, which receives the treatment, and a control group, which does not. By comparing the results from these groups, researchers can establish a causal relationship between the intervention and the outcomes.

There are key elements to consider in Group Comparison Analysis. First, the selection of participants must be randomized to eliminate bias. Second, the variables measured must be consistent and reliable to ensure accurate results. Finally, statistical methods are employed to analyze the data, providing a clearer understanding of any differences observed. Focusing on these fundamental aspects can significantly enhance the reliability of experimental findings, contributing to informed decision-making in various fields.

Definition and Purpose of Experimental Groups

Experimental groups are essential elements in the scientific method, particularly in research involving group comparison analysis. Defined simply, an experimental group is a set of individuals or samples subjected to a treatment or condition that is being tested. This allows researchers to observe the effects of the treatment and ascertain its effectiveness compared to other groups. Understanding this concept helps clarify how different variables influence outcomes, enabling better insights into the research subject.

The purpose of having experimental groups lies in their ability to generate reliable data that can be analyzed for meaningful conclusions. By comparing the results from the experimental group with control groups, researchers can identify causal relationships and assess the impact of specific interventions. This structured comparison is crucial for drawing accurate conclusions that guide future improvements, product development, or policy adjustments. Ultimately, experimental groups play a foundational role in advancing knowledge and understanding in various fields.

Definition and Purpose of Control Groups

Control groups are essential in experimental design, serving as the baseline for comparison. They do not receive the experimental treatment, allowing researchers to isolate the effects of the variable being tested. By maintaining consistency across conditions, control groups enable reliable group comparison analysis. This structured approach helps identify whether observed changes in the experimental group result from the treatment applied or other factors.

The purpose of control groups is to minimize bias and ensure valid results. When researchers analyze data, having a control group makes it easier to attribute differences to the independent variable. This distinction is crucial, especially in fields like psychology or medicine, where the impact of interventions can significantly influence outcomes. Understanding the role and purpose of control groups deepens comprehension of experimental results and strengthens the foundation of scientific inquiry.

Key Differences in Group Comparison Analysis

In group comparison analysis, distinguishing between experimental and control groups is essential. The experimental group receives the treatment or intervention being tested, allowing researchers to assess its effectiveness. Conversely, the control group serves as a baseline, remaining untouched by the experimental manipulation. This contrast helps isolate the effects of the intervention from other variables.

Additionally, group comparison analysis considers how random assignment to each group impacts study integrity. Randomization reduces bias, ensuring that results reflect the intervention's true impact rather than pre-existing differences. Furthermore, the measurement of outcomes in both groups is crucial for accurate analysis. Understanding these key differences allows researchers to draw reliable conclusions and make informed decisions based on the findings, enhancing the overall validity of their studies.

Design and Structure Differences

In any Group Comparison Analysis, the design and structure of experimental and control groups play a crucial role. Experimental groups receive the treatment or intervention being tested, while control groups do not, serving as a benchmark for comparison. This fundamental distinction allows researchers to assess the effects of a treatment effectively.

The methodological differences further extend to random assignment and blinding techniques. Random assignment ensures that participants are allocated to groups by chance, reducing bias and enhancing the validity of results. Blinding, whether single or double, minimizes participant and researcher expectations that could influence outcomes. Together, these elements contribute to the integrity of the research, ensuring that observed effects can be linked distinctly to the intervention rather than other variables. Understanding these design and structure differences is vital for interpreting results and drawing meaningful conclusions from the research.

Outcome Measurement and Analysis

In any experimental study, outcome measurement and analysis are crucial for understanding the differences between experimental and control groups. Group Comparison Analysis plays a vital role in evaluating the effectiveness of interventions. This process begins with identifying key metrics, such as time efficiency and quality of insights derived from participant data. It is essential to consider how these factors vary between the groups, allowing researchers to draw meaningful conclusions.

Furthermore, assessing qualitative aspects, such as participant engagement and thematic patterns, can provide deeper insight into the findings. This holistic approach ensures that variations within and across participants are explored. Trends and similarities can uncover common themes , allowing for a clearer understanding of underlying factors driving results. Ultimately, effective outcome measurement and analysis guide decisions based on empirical evidence, ensuring the reliability and validity of the study’s conclusions.

Conclusion: Summarizing Group Comparison Analysis Insights

In summary, the comparison between experimental and control groups yields valuable insights into the effectiveness of interventions. Group Comparison Analysis enables researchers to discern patterns and relationships that form the foundation for informed decisions. As shown in various studies, the experimental group often demonstrates significant differences in outcomes compared to the control group, illustrating the impact of specific variables.

Reflecting on the findings, it is crucial to appreciate the nuances in data interpretation. Understanding these differences not only enhances our methodologies but also paves the way for future research. Through careful analysis, we can transform theoretical insights into practical applications that advance our understanding of behavior and effectiveness in real-world scenarios.

Turn video, audio & docs, into actionable insights —in minutes

On this Page

Random Sampling Definition in Research

You may also like, qualitative research process diagram: steps and insights.

Qualitative Visualization: Tools and Tips

Simple qualitative map: how to create one.

Unlock Insights from Interviews 10x faster

• See a Live demo
• Start Analyzing Free

Insight7 transforms interviews, call recordings, surveys, and reviews into actionable insights in minutes, not weeks. Quickly uncover pain points, themes, desires, trends,  and sentiments from your files and documents..

Our CEO, Odun Odubanjo introduces new tools that simplify and enhance conversation analysis at scale. With Project Kits and a Visual Designer, Insight7 now makes it easier than ever to turn conversations into actionable insights and assets.

Experimental Design: Types, Examples & Methods

Saul McLeod, PhD

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Learn about our Editorial Process

Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.

On This Page:

Experimental design refers to how participants are allocated to different groups in an experiment. Types of design include repeated measures, independent groups, and matched pairs designs.

Probably the most common way to design an experiment in psychology is to divide the participants into two groups, the experimental group and the control group, and then introduce a change to the experimental group, not the control group.

The researcher must decide how he/she will allocate their sample to the different experimental groups.  For example, if there are 10 participants, will all 10 participants participate in both groups (e.g., repeated measures), or will the participants be split in half and take part in only one group each?

Three types of experimental designs are commonly used:

1. Independent Measures

Independent measures design, also known as between-groups , is an experimental design where different participants are used in each condition of the independent variable.  This means that each condition of the experiment includes a different group of participants.

This should be done by random allocation, ensuring that each participant has an equal chance of being assigned to one group.

Independent measures involve using two separate groups of participants, one in each condition. For example:

• Con : More people are needed than with the repeated measures design (i.e., more time-consuming).
• Pro : Avoids order effects (such as practice or fatigue) as people participate in one condition only.  If a person is involved in several conditions, they may become bored, tired, and fed up by the time they come to the second condition or become wise to the requirements of the experiment!
• Con : Differences between participants in the groups may affect results, for example, variations in age, gender, or social background.  These differences are known as participant variables (i.e., a type of extraneous variable ).
• Control : After the participants have been recruited, they should be randomly assigned to their groups. This should ensure the groups are similar, on average (reducing participant variables).

2. Repeated Measures Design

Repeated Measures design is an experimental design where the same participants participate in each independent variable condition.  This means that each experiment condition includes the same group of participants.

Repeated Measures design is also known as within-groups or within-subjects design .

• Pro : As the same participants are used in each condition, participant variables (i.e., individual differences) are reduced.
• Con : There may be order effects. Order effects refer to the order of the conditions affecting the participants’ behavior.  Performance in the second condition may be better because the participants know what to do (i.e., practice effect).  Or their performance might be worse in the second condition because they are tired (i.e., fatigue effect). This limitation can be controlled using counterbalancing.
• Pro : Fewer people are needed as they participate in all conditions (i.e., saves time).
• Control : To combat order effects, the researcher counter-balances the order of the conditions for the participants.  Alternating the order in which participants perform in different conditions of an experiment.

Counterbalancing

Suppose we used a repeated measures design in which all of the participants first learned words in “loud noise” and then learned them in “no noise.”

We expect the participants to learn better in “no noise” because of order effects, such as practice. However, a researcher can control for order effects using counterbalancing.

The sample would be split into two groups: experimental (A) and control (B).  For example, group 1 does ‘A’ then ‘B,’ and group 2 does ‘B’ then ‘A.’ This is to eliminate order effects.

Although order effects occur for each participant, they balance each other out in the results because they occur equally in both groups.

3. Matched Pairs Design

A matched pairs design is an experimental design where pairs of participants are matched in terms of key variables, such as age or socioeconomic status. One member of each pair is then placed into the experimental group and the other member into the control group .

One member of each matched pair must be randomly assigned to the experimental group and the other to the control group.

• Con : If one participant drops out, you lose 2 PPs’ data.
• Pro : Reduces participant variables because the researcher has tried to pair up the participants so that each condition has people with similar abilities and characteristics.
• Con : Very time-consuming trying to find closely matched pairs.
• Pro : It avoids order effects, so counterbalancing is not necessary.
• Con : Impossible to match people exactly unless they are identical twins!
• Control : Members of each pair should be randomly assigned to conditions. However, this does not solve all these problems.

Experimental design refers to how participants are allocated to an experiment’s different conditions (or IV levels). There are three types:

1. Independent measures / between-groups : Different participants are used in each condition of the independent variable.

2. Repeated measures /within groups : The same participants take part in each condition of the independent variable.

3. Matched pairs : Each condition uses different participants, but they are matched in terms of important characteristics, e.g., gender, age, intelligence, etc.

Learning Check

Read about each of the experiments below. For each experiment, identify (1) which experimental design was used; and (2) why the researcher might have used that design.

1 . To compare the effectiveness of two different types of therapy for depression, depressed patients were assigned to receive either cognitive therapy or behavior therapy for a 12-week period.

The researchers attempted to ensure that the patients in the two groups had similar severity of depressed symptoms by administering a standardized test of depression to each participant, then pairing them according to the severity of their symptoms.

2 . To assess the difference in reading comprehension between 7 and 9-year-olds, a researcher recruited each group from a local primary school. They were given the same passage of text to read and then asked a series of questions to assess their understanding.

3 . To assess the effectiveness of two different ways of teaching reading, a group of 5-year-olds was recruited from a primary school. Their level of reading ability was assessed, and then they were taught using scheme one for 20 weeks.

At the end of this period, their reading was reassessed, and a reading improvement score was calculated. They were then taught using scheme two for a further 20 weeks, and another reading improvement score for this period was calculated. The reading improvement scores for each child were then compared.

4 . To assess the effect of the organization on recall, a researcher randomly assigned student volunteers to two conditions.

Condition one attempted to recall a list of words that were organized into meaningful categories; condition two attempted to recall the same words, randomly grouped on the page.

Experiment Terminology

Ecological validity.

The degree to which an investigation represents real-life experiences.

Experimenter effects

These are the ways that the experimenter can accidentally influence the participant through their appearance or behavior.

Demand characteristics

The clues in an experiment lead the participants to think they know what the researcher is looking for (e.g., the experimenter’s body language).

Independent variable (IV)

The variable the experimenter manipulates (i.e., changes) is assumed to have a direct effect on the dependent variable.

Dependent variable (DV)

Variable the experimenter measures. This is the outcome (i.e., the result) of a study.

Extraneous variables (EV)

All variables which are not independent variables but could affect the results (DV) of the experiment. Extraneous variables should be controlled where possible.

Confounding variables

Variable(s) that have affected the results (DV), apart from the IV. A confounding variable could be an extraneous variable that has not been controlled.

Random Allocation

Randomly allocating participants to independent variable conditions means that all participants should have an equal chance of taking part in each condition.

The principle of random allocation is to avoid bias in how the experiment is carried out and limit the effects of participant variables.

Order effects

Changes in participants’ performance due to their repeating the same or similar test more than once. Examples of order effects include:

(i) practice effect: an improvement in performance on a task due to repetition, for example, because of familiarity with the task;

(ii) fatigue effect: a decrease in performance of a task due to repetition, for example, because of boredom or tiredness.

Control Group vs. Experimental Group: What's the Difference?

Key Differences

Comparison chart, exposure to, expected change, result utilization, control group and experimental group definitions, control group, experimental group, what is a control group, can an experiment have more than one control group, what is an experimental group, why does the experimental group undergo variable testing, how are participants allocated to control or experimental groups, what distinguishes the control group from the experimental group, what role does a control group play in scientific research, can an experiment proceed without an experimental group, why is a control group important, is it possible to have multiple experimental groups in a study, how should control and experimental groups be similar or different, what happens if an experiment lacks a control group, what types of variables are typically introduced to experimental groups, how is data compared between control and experimental groups, are control groups always necessary in experiments, can a participant be in both control and experimental groups, is it possible for a control group to exhibit changes, what is a placebo, concerning control groups, can control and experimental groups consist of different types of subjects, how are results validated using experimental and control groups.

Trending Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

New Comparisons

• Science, Tech, Math ›
• Chemistry ›

Understanding Experimental Groups

• Chemical Laws
• Periodic Table
• Projects & Experiments
• Scientific Method
• Biochemistry
• Physical Chemistry
• Medical Chemistry
• Chemistry In Everyday Life
• Famous Chemists
• Activities for Kids
• Abbreviations & Acronyms
• Weather & Climate
• Ph.D., Biomedical Sciences, University of Tennessee at Knoxville
• B.A., Physics and Mathematics, Hastings College

Scientific experiments often include two groups: the experimental group and the control group . Here's a closer look at the experimental group and how to distinguish it from the experimental group.

Key Takeaways: Experimental Group

• The experimental group is the set of subjects exposed to a change in the independent variable. While it's technically possible to have a single subject for an experimental group, the statistical validity of the experiment will be vastly improved by increasing the sample size.
• In contrast, the control group is identical in every way to the experimental group, except the independent variable is held constant. It's best to have a large sample size for the control group, too.
• It's possible for an experiment to contain more than one experimental group. However, in the cleanest experiments, only one variable is changed.

Experimental Group Definition

An experimental group in a scientific experiment is the group on which the experimental procedure is performed. The independent variable is changed for the group and the response or change in the dependent variable is recorded. In contrast, the group that does not receive the treatment or in which the independent variable is held constant is called the control group .

The purpose of having experimental and control groups is to have sufficient data to be reasonably sure the relationship between the independent and dependent variable is not due to chance. If you perform an experiment on only one subject (with and without treatment) or on one experimental subject and one control subject you have limited confidence in the outcome. The larger the sample size, the more probable the results represent a real correlation .

Example of an Experimental Group

You may be asked to identify the experimental group in an experiment as well as the control group. Here's an example of an experiment and how to tell these two key groups apart .

Let's say you want to see whether a nutritional supplement helps people lose weight. You want to design an experiment to test the effect. A poor experiment would be to take a supplement and see whether or not you lose weight. Why is it bad? You only have one data point! If you lose weight, it could be due to some other factor. A better experiment (though still pretty bad) would be to take the supplement, see if you lose weight, stop taking the supplement and see if the weight loss stops, then take it again and see if weight loss resumes. In this "experiment" you are the control group when you are not taking the supplement and the experimental group when you are taking it.

It's a terrible experiment for a number of reasons. One problem is that the same subject is being used as both the control group and the experimental group. You don't know, when you stop taking treatment, that is doesn't have a lasting effect. A solution is to design an experiment with truly separate control and experimental groups.

If you have a group of people who take the supplement and a group of people who do not, the ones exposed to the treatment (taking the supplement) are the experimental group. The ones not-taking it are the control group.

How to Tell Control and Experimental Group Apart

In an ideal situation, every factor that affects a member of both the control group and experimental group is exactly the same except for one -- the independent variable . In a basic experiment, this could be whether something is present or not. Present = experimental; absent = control.

Sometimes, it's more complicated and the control is "normal" and the experimental group is "not normal". For example, if you want to see whether or not darkness has an effect on plant growth. Your control group might be plants grown under ordinary day/night conditions. You could have a couple of experimental groups. One set of plants might be exposed to perpetual daylight, while another might be exposed to perpetual darkness. Here, any group where the variable is changed from normal is an experimental group. Both the all-light and all-dark groups are types of experimental groups.

Bailey, R.A. (2008). Design of Comparative Experiments . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521683579.

Hinkelmann, Klaus and Kempthorne, Oscar (2008). Design and Analysis of Experiments, Volume I: Introduction to Experimental Design (Second ed.). Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-72756-9.

• The Difference Between Control Group and Experimental Group
• What Is a Control Group?
• What Is an Experiment? Definition and Design
• How to Calculate Experimental Error in Chemistry
• Scientific Method Lesson Plan
• 10 Things You Need To Know About Chemistry
• Hydroxyl Group Definition in Chemistry
• Chemistry 101 - Introduction & Index of Topics
• Can You Really Turn Lead Into Gold?
• Molecular Mass Definition
• How to Write a Lab Report
• Platinum Group Metals (PGMs)
• Defining Prepregs
• Periodic Table Study Guide - Introduction & History
• Catalysts Definition and How They Work
• Examples of Physical Properties of Matter - Comprehensive List